* Applicable Membership or Subscription discounts will be added in your shopping cart
Description: In a pathbreaking 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) provision clearly and unmistakably requiring union members to arbitrate Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) claims is enforceable. In an opinion written by Justice Thomas, the Court found that the National Labor Relations Act (?NLRA?) provided the union and the employer with the statutory authority to collectively bargain for arbitration of employment discrimination claims. The Court expressed confidence that the substantive statutory rights conveyed by the ADEA i.e., the right to be free from workplace discrimination ? could be vindicated in arbitration as well as in court. The dissent asserted that the majority opinion may have little effect, for it explicitly reserves the question whether a CBA's waiver of a judicial forum is enforceable when the union controls access to and presentation of employees claims in arbitration.
Our panel of experts, including attorney writers from the renowned Bales SCOTUSblog, will address:
-
How does the decision impact employers? Unions?
-
What questions are left unanswered by Pyett?
-
How big of an event is this decision on the labor/employment landscape?
-
Will there be a legislative response to the decision, and if so, what form will it take?
| Practice Areas: | | Alternative Dispute Resolution, Employment Law, Labor Law, Litigation & Appeals | | Online Media Type: | | Audio | | Production Date: | | 04/28/2009 12:30 PM EDT | | Level: | | Intermediate | | Category: | | Standard | | Duration: | | 1 Hours, 30 Minutes | | Online Format: | | Live | | Course Type: | | Public |
Click here for information on subscription discounts and Group Viewing opportunities.
Purchase of this product provides online access for 180 days. If you are purchasing a live webcast, you will receive complimentary access to the on demand version for 180 days once it becomes available. Please note that the on demand and podcast versions may, or may not be accredited in your state.
If you intend to take a course for CLE credit, please make sure your state is listed in the "Accreditation" section to the upper right of the program description. Accreditation displayed is unique to the purchased program format (live conference, live webcast, on demand, podcast). Credit totals listed for live conferences are the maximum credits available. Credits issued will be based upon actual time in attendance. Credit totals for other formats are for complete programs. Partial credit is not available for any online or downloadable format.
West LegalEdcenter will not provide accreditation for states not listed.
CLE Scholarship information Tuition Assistance for legal professionals taking our programs. Learn more about the program.
This product is intended for individual use by the named purchaser. Group viewings for online programs may be arranged for five or more attorneys within the same organization prior to viewing by emailing west.wlec-sales@thomson.com.
People who bought this program also bought:There are no current recommendations |
| | |
|
| Click on the jurisdiction to view credit eligibility details for this program
AK,
AR, AZ, CA, CO, CPE-NASBA, ID, LA, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, NY-EXPER, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, UT, VA, VI, VT, WV West LegalEdcenter provides accreditation as described here. You may be able to self apply for credits in states not listed.
Request credits for a state not listed.
Check your state requirements and get contact information. | | |
|
|
| • | Rick Bales - Professor of Law and Associate Dean of Faculty Development, Northern Kentucky University, Salmon P. Chase School of Law
| • | Thomas C. Goldstein, Esq. - Partner, Co-head of the firmwide litigation and Supreme Court practices, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP | • | Richard J. Rabin - Partner, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP |
| | |
|